But this week, the Justice Department asked for a further delay until Jan. The government had been set to tell the court its position on Friday. The Biden administration intervened and said it wanted to inform the court what would serve the interests of the country. Seven State Department contractors who had separately sued the Taliban over a 2016 bombing also sought to enforce a $138 million default judgment. Marshal to serve the legal department of the Federal Reserve of New York with a “writ of execution” to seize the money to cover a judgment of roughly $7 billion in damages they obtained a decade ago. In September, the Havlish plaintiffs persuaded a judge to approve sending a U.S. It was not clear who had the legal authority to gain access to those funds anymore, and longstanding counterterrorism sanctions make it illegal to wire money to the Taliban, who have proclaimed themselves the new government and demanded access to the funds. The interjections add further complications to a thorny issue that has raised a set of legal and diplomatic problems surrounding the Afghan money in New York, which had accumulated from foreign aid meant for the country’s former government and other sources.Īfter that government dissolved amid the Taliban takeover, the Federal Reserve blocked access to the account. Testiness between the legal teams is rising, letters filed in court show. 11 victims indicated they want to seek a share of the funds, too. 11 victims in a case known as Havlish, lawyers for other groups of Sept.
This week, after The New York Times reported on such efforts by a group of about 150 relatives of Sept. But the collapse of the government of Afghanistan and the Taliban’s military takeover of that country have raised the possibility that they could seize the Afghan government funds in New York. When the defendants did not show up in court, the plaintiffs won default judgments years ago.īecause there was no way to collect money from such defendants, the judgments that they were liable for the losses the plaintiffs had suffered seemed merely symbolic. The dispute stems from various lawsuits that groups of attack victims - the estates of those killed, along with their spouses, children and other relatives, and survivors who were injured - filed against Al Qaeda and others they said provided support to the terrorists, like the Taliban. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks over who can try to seize $7 billion in Afghan central bank funds deposited at the New York Federal Reserve - money the Taliban now claims is theirs. WASHINGTON - A fight is breaking out among lawyers for different groups of victims of the Sept.
0 kommentar(er)
